Διάλεξη του Παντελή Γκολίτση (31/1, 17:45 ώρα Ελλάδος) στο Πανεπιστήμιο του Πόζναν με θέμα την ιστορία της νεοελληνικής Λογικής. Η διάλεξη (“The teaching of logic in Early Modern Greece: Did a post-Byzantine philosophy really exist?”) θα μεταδοθεί διαδικτυακά μέσω του συνδέσμου
Abstract:
Contemporary historiography of philosophy addresses the philosophy produced in Greek after the Fall of Constantinople and until the Modern Greek Enlightenment through two fundamental frameworks: (a) post-Byzantine philosophy; (b) Corydallism, which is preceded by a ‘pre-Corydallic’ and followed by a ‘post-Corydallic’ period. Despite their differences, both frameworks posit a continuity of this philosophy with the preceding Byzantine philosophy. I argue that the structure and contents of the treatises and handbooks of logic produced in the Heptanese and in Ottoman Greece during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries cannot by any means be accounted for with reference to Byzantine or Late Antique philosophy. Mutatis mutandis, especially in light of the extensive presence of Aristotle’s Organon in the commentaries and treatises of the Palaeologan period, this remark should also be valid for the Early Modern Greek treatises on natural philosophy and metaphysics.
